Legal Opinion
Tennell v. HORSEHEAD CORP.
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided December 27, 2010No. 107,836. Released for Publication by Order of the Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, Division No. 3PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
LARRY JOPLIN, Presiding Judge.
{1 Petitioner Daniel Ben Tennell (Claimant) seeks review of an order of a three-judge panel of the Workers' Compensation Court affirming the trial court's decision to deny his claim. In this review proceeding, Claimant challenges the trial court's order as lacking sufficient specificity to permit intelligent review, and the order of the three-judge panel as affected by errors of both fact and law.
12 Claimant alleged that he sustained an injury arising out of and in the course of his employment with Respondent Horsehead Corporation (Employer) when he slipped and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Parks v. Norman Municipal HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Armstrong v. Asten-Hill Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- Hengemuhle v. Long Prairie JayceesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
- Steele v. North Dakota Workmen's Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- King Manufacturing v. MeadowsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Joe Brown Co. v. MeltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2013