Tart v. Martin
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
WAINWRIGHT, Justice.
This appeal involves the theory of negligent entrustment, which imposes liability upon the owner of a motor vehicle for a third party’s negligent operation of the vehicle. On 5 October 1998, plaintiff Willie B. Tart filed suit against defendants James L. Martin and Peggy H. Martin, alleging that defendants were liable for their son’s negligence in an automobile accident under the family purpose doctrine and the theory of negligent entrustment. Defendants answered denying their liability and thereafter filed a motion for summary judgment. On 10 February 1999, the trial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Roberts v. HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Bogen v. . BogenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Fordham v. EasonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1999
- Heath v. KirkmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- McFadyen v. Duke UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2011
- Lumsden Ex Rel. Estate of Lumsden v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2008
- Bridges v. ParrishCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2012
- Griswold v. Integon General InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- Chappell v. WebbCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2024
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.