Legal Opinion

Newland v. Saul

District Court, D. Alaska

Decided September 5, 2019No. 3:19-cv-00078Unknown

1Opinion

WO IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ALASKA RANDY D. NEWLAND, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) vs. ) ) ANDREW M. SAUL, Commissioner of ) Social Security Administration, ) ) No. 3:19-cv-0078-HRH Defendant. ) _______________________________________) O R D E R This is an action for judicial review of the denial of disability benefits under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act,

42 U.S.C. §§ 401-434, 1381-1383f. Plaintiff Randy Dell Newland has timely filed his opening brief,1 to which defendant, Andrew M. Saul, has timely responded.2 Oral argument was not requested and is not…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Tackett v. ApfelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
  2. Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  3. Raymond E. ANDREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. Jana M. Bayliss v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Gordon Stout v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API