Legal Opinion
Camaj v. Holder
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided November 8, 2010No. 09-3926PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BARZILAY, Judge.
Petitioner-Appellant Anton Camaj seeks review of an order of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“the Board”) affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his motion to reopen proceedings after the issuance of an in absentia deportation order. He challenges the validity of the order on the grounds that he did not receive legally sufficient notice of the hearing at which he failed to appear or, in the alternative, that the IJ unlawfully treated his slight tardiness to the hearing as a failure to appear. For the reasons below, we find that the IJ did not abuse her…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Perez v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Svitlana Denko v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Vaso and Djela Perkovic v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
- Duha v. Agrium, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Hanan Haddad v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Gualterio Santos-Santos v. William P. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2019
- Anthony Thompson v. Loretta LynchCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- Juan Valadez-Lara v. William P. BarrCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2020
- Johnson v. ClaftonDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2015
- Vitalina Lucas Lopez v. Merrick B. GarlandCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.