Hanan Haddad v. Alberto R. Gonzales, Attorney General
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner Hanan Haddad (“Haddad”), a Jordanian citizen, petitions for review the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA” or “Board”) denying as untimely her motion to reopen removal proceedings. Haddad argues that the BIA erred because her divorce constitutes a “changed circumstance” that makes the usual deadline inapplicable to her. This exception requires changed country (not personal) circumstances, however, so Had-dad was subject to the deadline. Because the motion to reopen was filed late, we DENY Haddad’s petition for review.
I. BACKGROUND
The…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. AbuduSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. DohertySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Rolando Augustine Castellano-Chacon v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Li Yong Zheng v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
- Kishin Ramchand Balani v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by73 opinions
- Yuen Jin v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- C-W-LBoard of Immigration Appeals · 2007
- Khan v. Attorney General of United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
- Barry v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2008
- Cheng Chen v. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.