Legal Opinion

Bushnell v. Mitchell

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided March 28, 1958No. Civ. A. No. 1574PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DANIEL HOLCOMBE THOMAS, District Judge.

Action to recover $21,780.56, plus interest, on an insurance agency agreement entered into between the Trans-Pacific Insurance Company and William H. Mitchell, doing business as Mobile Insurance Agency. The case was tried to the court without jury, on complaint and answer, stipulation of facts, exhibits, arguments and briefs of the parties. The complaint is in two counts, the first of which seeks to recover $16,298.74 with interest for premiums alleged to have been collected by the defendant agent from holders of policies issued by the said Company, less…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bohlinger v. Ward & Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1956
  2. Robertson v. Malone, Insurance CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
  3. Alliance Ins. Co. v. City Realty Co.District Court, M.D. Georgia · 1931
  4. People Ex Rel. Palmer v. Peoria Life InsuranceIllinois Supreme Court · 1941
  5. The American National Bank of Saint Paul v. National Indemnity Company of OmahaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1955

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sheeran v. SitrenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1979
  2. Trimble v. CoppageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
  3. Allied Mutual Insurance v. RobersonDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API