Koutsogiannis v. BB & T
Supreme Court of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Justice MOORE:
Following a jury’s finding that appellant (BB & T) was grossly negligent in its conduct regarding an automobile loan, BB & T appealed on the basis the trial court erred by failing to give a requested instruction to the jury. We certified this matter from the Court of Appeals pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR. We affirm.
ISSUE
Did the trial court err by refusing to charge the jury the law of independent contractor?
FACTS
In July 1996, respondent financed the purchase of a car with a loan from United Carolina Bank, which subsequently merged into BB & T. In May 1999, respondent made a…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Rickborn v. Liberty Life InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. Wilson, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1989
- McCourt by and Through McCourt v. AbernathySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Stiles v. OnoratoSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1995
- Hewes v. WolfeCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Dezzani v. Kern & Assocs., Ltd.Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
- Ardis v. SessionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- Ardis v. SessionsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2006
- DEZZANI VS. KERN & ASSOC.'S, LTD. C/W 69410Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
- DEZZANI VS. KERN & ASSOC.'S, LTD. C/W 69410Nevada Supreme Court · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.