Legal Opinion

Forrester v. Smith & Steele Builders, Inc.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 19, 1987No. 0865PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

Respondent George W. Forrester sought injunctive relief against the City of Mauldin and Smith & Steele Builders, Inc. (Builders) to enjoin Builders from completing and occupying a structure it had built. Forrester also sought money damages against Builders. All parties moved for summary judgment. Forrester’s motion for summary judgment on liability was granted. The City’s and Builders’ motions were denied. Builders has appealed only the trial court’s order granting Forrester’s motion for summary judgment. We reverse.

Forrester bought a tract of land in the City of Mauldin in…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Green v. ZimmermanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1977
  2. Momeier v. John McAlister, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1943
  3. Mecklenburg County v. WestberyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. Aughtry v. FarrellSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1961
  5. Lindsay v. MAIN INSURANCE COMPANYCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Forrester v. Smith & Steele Builders, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API