Forrester v. Smith & Steele Builders, Inc.
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Cureton, Judge:
Forrester originally sued Smith & Steele Builders Inc. and the City of Mauldin to enjoin Builders from completing and occupying a structure and to require removal of the partially completed building. He claimed the structure violated the setback requirements of the City’s zoning ordinance. Forrester also sought money damages from Builders. The trial judge granted summary judgment to Forrester on liability. Builders appealed. This court reversed finding a genuine issue of fact existed as to whether Forrester suffered special damages so that he may maintain a suit in equity to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Zenith Radio Corp. v. Hazeltine Research, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States Department of Justice v. LandanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
- Crowley Ex Rel. Estate of Crowley v. SpiveyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Tanner v. Florence County TreasurerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
- Foggie v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Skydive Myrtle Beach, Inc. v. Horry Cnty.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2019
- Foggie v. CSX Transportation, Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- Pool v. PoolSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1998
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.