Legal Opinion
Farr v. Spatial Technology, Inc.
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided March 2, 1993No. Civ. A. No. C-1-92-606PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*115 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION
SHERMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
This diversity action for defamation and breach of contract arises from plaintiff Rich Farr’s job termination by his employer, defendant Spatial Technology, a Delaware corporation with its principal place of business in Boulder, Colorado. On November 23, 1992 the Court heard oral argument on, and took under submission, defendant’s motion to dismiss “for lack of jurisdiction over the person, insufficiency of service of process and improper venue” (doc. 2). See also doc. 4 (plaintiffs memorandum in opposition), doc. 5…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Southern MacHine Company, Inc. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
- Herman Theunissen and Ann Theunissen v. Sid Matthews D/B/A Matthews Lumber TransferCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Friedman v. Estate of PresserCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Jones v. TrumpDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1996
- Boller v. Everything Ice, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024