Legal Opinion · Dissent

People v. Sisson

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1939No. Crim. 3140Published

1Dissent

McCOMB, J., Dissenting.

I dissent.

Defendants were accused by the district attorney of the county of Los Angeles of the crime of conspiracy to commit grand theft and, in seven separate counts, of having committed grand theft. They were tried jointly before the court without a jury, who found the defendants guilty as follows: John Mossman Meyer—Counts VI, VII, and VIII. Warren R. Sheehan | —Counts II, III, IV, V, VI, VII, William Brooks Sisson ( and VIII. E. S. Tremelling—Counts II, III, IV, V, and VIII.

The information was dismissed as to defendant W. M. Fidroeff and the court granted defendants…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. People v. WasservogleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
  3. People v. KizerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913
  4. People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  5. People v. LamsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API