Legal Opinion

State v. Anfield

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 8, 1989No. C 87-12-36880; CA A48488PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, P. J.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a controlled substance. ORS 475.992(4). He assigns as error the denial of his motion to suppress evidence obtained in a warrantless search of a bag that he was carrying. We reverse.

At about 3:25 a.m. on November 18, 1987, officers Smith and Hooper, who were in a marked patrol car, saw defendant walking down a street in a “high drug area,” carrying a bag over his shoulder. Smith shined a spotlight on defendant and asked to speak to him. The officers parked their car by the curb several feet in front of defendant; both of them got out of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WarnerOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  2. State v. KennedyOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. HortonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987
  4. State v. HagemanCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  5. State v. PenneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. FikesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  2. State v. MorelliCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  3. Garza v. City of SalemDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
  4. State v. BlountCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  5. State v. BlountCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API