Legal Opinion

Planning Zon. Comm'n v. Zon. Bd. of Appeals, No. 105428 (Jul. 8, 1992)

Connecticut Superior Court

Decided July 8, 1992No. 105428Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

This action is an appeal by a planning and zoning commission (hereinafter Commission) from a variance of set back lines granted by a zoning board of appeals (hereinafter Board) to Mrs. Benedict. Two issues are addressed: (1) whether the Commission is an aggrieved party entitled to appeal; and (2) whether in granting the variance, the Board acted within its statutory authority.

I

Pursuant to General Statutes 8-8(b), ". . . any person aggrieved by the decision of a board may take an appeal to the superior court . . .". Aggrievement is divided into two general categories, statutory and classical.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Primerica v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  2. Florentine v. Town of DarienSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1955
  3. Smith v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978
  4. Chevron Oil Co. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1976
  5. Tyler v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1958

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API