Legal Opinion

State v. Miskell

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided September 10, 1982No. 81-414PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBatchelder, J.

This appeal raises the issue of the application of the rape shield statute (RSA 632-A:6 (Supp. 1981)) to questions asked of a prosecutrix in a rape case during a discovery deposition. The Trial Court {Dunn, J.) granted a motion to compel answers to the deposition, and this interlocutory appeal followed. Because RSA 632-A:6 is applicable to the discovery process, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand.

The prosecutrix has alleged that she was raped on the night of August 7, 1980. The defendant was subsequently charged with aggravated felonious sexual assault, RSA 632-A:2 (Supp. 1981).…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. HowardSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  2. State v. LaClairSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  3. State v. SielSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1982
  4. Goodrow v. PerrinSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  5. Riddle Spring Realty Co. v. StateSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1966

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. GonzalezWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  2. State v. DunbarSupreme Court of Vermont · 1989
  3. State v. DeanSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1987
  4. State v. DuketteSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  5. State v. GonyawSupreme Court of Vermont · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API