Legal Opinion

In re Muto

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 19, 2002PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent Joseph F. Muto was admitted to the practice of *189law in the State of New York by the Third Judicial Department on January 27, 1987, as Joseph Francis Muto. Respondent is also admitted to practice in Colorado. At all times relevant to the charges here at issue, respondent maintained an office for the practice of law within the First Judicial Department.

On or about February 27, 2001, petitioner Departmental Disciplinary Committee (DDC) served respondent with a notice and statement of charges charging respondent with 43 counts of professional misconduct in connection…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re HunterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. In re KranisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  3. In re EvangelistaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  4. In re StenstromAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  5. In re MutoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jian Hua Wang v. Board of Immigration AppealsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  2. Yi Long Yang v. Alberto R. Gonzales, 1 United States Attorney GeneralCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
  3. In re HattonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. In re AlejandroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  5. In re RodkinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API