State v. Gardner

ARNOLD, Judge.

Defendant brings forward three assignments of error in his brief regarding his cross-examination, the court’s conduct during the jury’s deliberation and his conviction of felonious breaking and entering. We conclude that no reversible error was committed by the trial court.

Defendant first assigns error to his cross-examination involving whether he gave the arresting officer a statement. He contends that his constitutional rights against self-incrimination and to due process of law were violated on cross-examination.

On direct examination defendant testified that his relationship…