Legal Opinion

In re Bailey

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1883PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPotter, J.

— This is a motion, upon petition, that Joseph Pool show cause why the sheriff should not return an execution issued to him by said Pool, as attorney for the above railroad company, as satisfied, when the sheriff’s fees thereon are paid, and why the petitioner should not be allowed to retain the sums that he has received upon the judgment (being the full amount thereof) on which said execution was issued.

From the papers presented by the petition of the receiver, *65and the affidavits, it appears that one Gildersleeve brought an action against the Pelham and Portchester Eailroad Company, and Hr.…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. Okyle v. Highbridge Family Laundry Service, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API