Legal Opinion

Okyle v. Highbridge Family Laundry Service, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 30, 1942PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.

This is a motion by the substituted receiver herein to vacate or resettle the order of this court made on May 6,1942, which fixed the compensation of plaintiff’s former attorneys, *154upon a motion made for a substitution of attorneys. The compensation was fixed at the sum of $500 and the order provided that said sum “is to be a lien on any moneys collected under the judgment rendered or to be rendered in this action. ’ ’

This action was prosecuted to judgment; the plaintiff was appointed receiver but was later removed and the present receiver was substituted; by order of this court he was…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. City Bank of Wheeling v. BryanWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Bowling Green Savings Bank v. ToddNew York Supreme Court · 1872
  3. Cory v. HarteNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1885
  4. In re BaileyNew York Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Active Wholesalers, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Okyle v. Highbridge Family Laundry Service, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API