Legal Opinion
Estrada v. Progressive Direct Insurance
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 20, 2014No. Civil No. 12-30020-FDSPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
SAYLOR, District Judge.
This is a putative class action alleging unfair and deceptive practices in the online sale of automobile-insurance policies. *486Plaintiffs Wanda Estrada, Walter Estrada, J.E., Natalie Estrada, Carmen Badillo, and Jose Burgos purchased automobile insurance from defendant Progressive Direct Insurance Company.1 Plaintiffs were all denied personal-injury-protection (“PIP”) benefits by defendant after they were involved in automobile accidents because they purchased insurance policies with an $8,000 PIP deductible.…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Samuel Mesnick v. General Electric CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Jose MEDINA-MUNOZ, Etc., Et Al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
- Patrick J. O'COnnOr v. Robert W. SteevesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Formulatrix, Inc. v. Rigaku Automation, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- AKWELEY ABLORH v. TOWN OF STONEHAM, DAVID STEFANELLI, SHERYL ROTONDI, & BRIAN RAFFAELODistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2025
- Allscripts Healthcare, LLC v. DR/Decision Resources, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
- Downing v. Keurig Green Mountain, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2021
- Formulatrix, Inc. v. Rigaku Automation, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.