Legal Opinion
Hiefner v. University of Tennessee
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided November 20, 1995No. 3:95-cv-00365PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JARVIS, Chief Judge.
This pro se action seeks fines and monetary damages for violation of plaintiffs constitutional rights under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution. Additionally, plaintiff alleges some sort of discrimination based on the loss of his employment benefits and workers’ compensation. 1 As previously noted by the court in a memorandum opinion [Doe. 28] filed on August 25, 1995, the initial complaint is “rambling, incoherent, and references documents which are not attached to it.” 2 [See id., p. 1]. The court treated a response by plaintiff to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Laurel C. Thomas v. Walter Shipka, in His Capacity as Clerk of the Parma Municipal CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Chavez-SanchezSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Timothy Sumner v. Campbell Clinic, PCCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2016
- Boinapally v. University of TennesseeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2001
- Henderson v. SOUTHWEST TENNESSEE COMMUNITY COLLEGEDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2003
- Dowlen v. The City of Springfield, TennesseeDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025
- Rives v. University of TennesseeDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2024