Carlson v. Haglin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Action in the district court for St. Louis county to recover from defendants, Charles F. Haglin and Peavey Duluth Terminal Company, $10,335 for personal injuries. The case was tried before Dibell, ]., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff for $2,835. Thereafter, on motion, judgment was ordered for defendants notwithstanding the verdict. From this judgment plaintiff appealed..
1Opinion of the CourtLovely, J.
Plaintiff recovered a verdict for personal injuries. Defendants’ motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict was granted. From, this judgment plaintiff appeals.
In disposing of the questions raised on this appeal, many of the-details may be omitted under the view we have taken of the proper determination of the one controlling question, whether the liability of the master to provide a reasonably safe place for his servants to work was, under, the circumstances, fulfilled.
It appears by the record that from the latter part of June, 1903, and' for more than three months thereafter, defendants…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Borgerson v. Cook Stone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Gittens v. William Porten Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
- Hagerty v. EvansSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jacobson v. Hobart Iron Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1908
- Block v. Minnesota Farmers Brick & Tile Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Volpe v. CederstrandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Hamlin v. Lanquist & Illsley Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1910