Legal Opinion

Marbury v. May

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 2, 1925No. 4220PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

This suit in ejectment was filed by. plaintiffs in error, who alleged in their declaration that they were the owners in fee and entitled to the immediate possession of two tracts of land, one of which was claimed and occupied by William T. May, and the other by William H. and Charles Acker. Defendants controverted the elaims of plaintiffs, and alleged ownership of the tracts described in their respective answers under pleas of adverse possession for more than seven years next before the institution of the suit.

The trial court concluded from the evidence, as stated in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Southern Coal & Iron Co. v. SchwoonTennessee Supreme Court · 1921
  2. East Tennessee Iron & Coal Co. v. WigginCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1895
  3. American Nat. Bank of Nashville v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1911
  4. Currens v. LauderdaleTennessee Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. May v. MarburyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API