Legal Opinion
ANDERSON v. Purvis
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided October 1, 1951No. 16548PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
StukEs, Justice.
This case was very largely decided in the first appeal of it which is reported under the same title in 211 S. C. 255, 44 S. E. (2d) 611. It was there held, in effect, that the respondent mortgagor is entitled to offset of the reasonable value of the professional medical services rendered by him to the mortgagee and the other members of his family, in the nature of quantum meruit. Upon trial of the issue of the value of the services the master found $125.00 per year, aggregating $3,125.00 to which interest was added, which was confirmed by decree of the court on appeal.
Appellant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Woerz v. . SchumacherNew York Court of Appeals · 1900
- Tuzzeo v. . American Bonding Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Epworth Orphanage v. LongSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
- Blun v. . MayerNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
- Anderson v. PurvisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Weeks v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
- Dixon v. DixonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005
- Montgomery Ward & Co., Incorporated v. Collins Estate, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1959
- QHG of Lake City, Inc. v. McCutcheonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
- Johnson v. Aetna InsuranceDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.