Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Dixon

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 18, 2005No. 25925PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Justice TOAL:

This Court certified this case pursuant to Rule 204(b), SCACR, to review the master-in-equity’s decision declaring Stevan Fay Dixon (Son) the titleholder of his mother’s home in fee simple absolute. We affirm.

Factual/Procedural Background

Appellant Mabel Dixon (Mother) is eighty-four-years old and has lived alone in her home in Anderson, South Carolina for the past forty-seven years. She has two children: Stevan (Son), who resides in Anderson, and Nicki, who, at the time of trial, resided in Ohio. Other than a hearing problem, 1 Mother has no health problems.

In October 1998,…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources v. Town of McClellanvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2001
  3. Dean v. Ruscon Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  4. Cafe Associates, Ltd. v. GerngrossSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  5. Klutts Resort Realty, Inc. v. Down'Round Development Corp.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Bank of New York v. Sumter CountySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  2. Two Trees v. Builders Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Wilson v. DallasSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  4. South Carolina Coastal Conservation League v. South Carolina Department of Health & Environmental ControlCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  5. Mazloom v. MazloomCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2009

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API