State ex rel. Wember v. Kingston
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNelson, J.
It is well established that a motion to quash an alternative writ of mandamus is regarded as a demurrer. State ex rel. Cothren v. Lean, 9 Wis. *279; State ex rel. Sherman v. Common Council, 20 Wis. *87; State ex rel. Court of Honor v. Giljohann, 111 Wis. 377, 87 N. W. 245; State ex rel. Baraboo v. Page, 201 Wis. 262, 229 N. W. 40.
The question for decision, therefore, is whether the petition of the relators states a cause of action against the Commissioner of Banking. No claim is made by the commissioner that the articles' of incorporation do not fully comply with the provisions of sec. 222.01 of the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. City of Baraboo v. PageWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
- State ex rel. Court of Honor of Illinois v. GiljohannWisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
3Cited by4 opinions
- State ex rel. Karnes v. Board of Regents of Normal SchoolsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1936
- Guardian Agency, Inc. v. Guardian Mutual Savings BankWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
- State Ex Rel. City of Madison v. BareisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1946
- Westgate Hotel, Inc. v. KrumbiegelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1968