State ex rel. City of Baraboo v. Page

The following opinion was filed February 4, 1930:

Fritz, J.

Upon consideration of all facts alleged in the petition, including paragraphs 3, 4, 5, and 9, we have concluded that the court did not err in granting respondent’s motion to quash the alternative writ. That conclusion ob*264viates the necessity for further consideration of the alleged errors of the court in enjoining the proposed adverse examination of the respondent, and in ordering paragraphs 3, 4, 5; and 9 stricken from the petition.

The consideration of the alleged error in granting respondent’s motion to quash the alternative writ…