Fisch v. Randall Mill Corp.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Fletcher, Justice.
This appeal concerns whether the phrase “worked” or “attempted to work the mineral rights” in the state mineral lapse statute is unconstitutionally vague under the Georgia or Federal Constitutions. We hold that the statute is not vague and affirm the trial court’s order that Randall Mill Corporation has gained absolute title to the disputed mineral rights.
Randall Mill purchased property in North Fulton County in 1989 and filed a petition for declaratory judgment under OCGA § 44-5-168. The petition alleged that no one worked or attempted to work the mineral rights in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hayes v. HowellSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
- Anderson v. Little & Davenport Funeral Home, Inc.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1978
- City of Atlanta v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1958
- Georgia Marble Co. v. WhitlockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
- Brooke v. DellingerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Santana v. Georgia Power Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1998
- Rouse v. Department of Natural ResourcesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1999
- Allgood Farm, LLC v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
- James F. Nelson, Jr. Family Ltd. Partnership v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- City of Atlanta v. MorganSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.