Legal Opinion
Abraham v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided November 9, 1926No. Nos. 6892, 6893PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HUNGER, District Judge.
The plaintiff in error was convicted under an indictment charging that he transported and caused to be transported an automobile in interstate commerce, knowing it to have been stolen, and prosecutes error. There are two writs of error in this case, but as the second writ is founded upon an amended assignment of errors, and a second writ of error to the same judgment, the latter only needs to he considered.
The sufficiency of the indictment is challenged. It alleged that plaintiff in error and others feloniously transported and caused to be transported in interstate…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kirby v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Whitaker v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Mitchell v. the Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1898
- White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1921
- Devore v. Territory of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. TurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Tingley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
- George C. Schwab v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1964
- Simmons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1976
- Robertson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1948
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.