State v. Arnold
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
HIGGINS, Commissioner.
Appeal from order denying motion to withdraw guilty plea under Criminal Rule 27.25, V.A.M.R., considered as proceeding to vacate sentence under Criminal Rule 27.26, V.A.M.R. State v. Harris, Mo., 382 S.W.2d 642, 643.
By information filed September 24, 1965, Cause 1854-N was commenced, and it was charged that Morris Watson and George L. Arnold did feloniously and unlawfully and by means of deceit obtain a certain narcotic drug, Dilaudid tablets, by uttering, offering and passing as true and genuine a certain false prescription to Mack Gas-away, a druggist.
On September 29,…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1954
- State v. BlaylockSupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1962
- State v. SkaggsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- State v. ParkerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. MountjoySupreme Court of Missouri · 1967
- Drew v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- McCrary v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1975
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1969
- Bradley v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1973
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.