Shell Oil Company v. Collar
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
BERNSTEIN, Justice.
Defendant, the Shell Oil Company, appeals from a $30,000 judgment entered against it in the superior court of Yuma County, and submits that the judgment should be reversed with the trial court instructed to enter judgment for defendant, or that the judgment should be reversed and the superior court be instructed to grant its motions for a new trial.
Plaintiff named three defendants in her complaint. After her case in chief was presented to the jury the superior court granted Butane Corporation’s motion for a directed verdict. The motion to dismiss Tate and Hobart Gas and…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Menard v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- Davis v. BoggsArizona Supreme Court · 1921
- Fish v. Southern Pacific Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Kindt v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
- Berg v. N.Y.C.R.R. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1945
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- E. L. Jones Construction Co. v. NolandArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Salinas v. KahnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
- Cagle v. CarrArizona Supreme Court · 1966
- Byars v. Arizona Public Service CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975
- City of Glendale v. BradshawCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.