Legal Opinion
People v. Hill
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 13, 1982No. Crim. 40274PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GATES, J.
Weston Hill appeals from the order extending his commitment under Penal Code section 1026.5. He contends: “The motion to dismiss the extended commitment proceedings for lack of timely filing/hearing of the petition should have been granted.”
In 1976 appellant was committed to a state hospital for treatment pursuant to section 1026 of the Penal Code after he had been found not guilty of felonious assault (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)) by reason of his insanity. The terminal date of his potential confinement was later determined to be December 28, 1980. Therefore, in order to…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In Re MoyeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- People v. PaciniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. PoggiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- In Re JohnsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
- People v. LakeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- People v. LaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- People v. AllenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
- City of Los Angeles v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1982
- People v. KirklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.