United States v. 103.38 Acres of Land
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.
This case requires us to review the methods of property valuation which may properly serve as the basis of an award in federal eminent domain proceedings. Specifically, we must examine the types of evidence the trier of fact should consider in determining the value of condemned mineral-bearing property.
We are concerned with a 103-acre tract of unimproved land, purchased by appellants Frank and Doris Oldfield in 1968. The property, located in eastern Kentucky, overlies a portion of the Van Lear coal seam, an important source of high quality, low sulphur…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Almota Farmers Elevator & Warehouse Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Montana Railway Co. v. WarrenSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- United States v. SowardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Welch v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1939
- Missouri-Kansas Pipe Line Co. v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. L.E. Cooke Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Maguire Oil Co. v. City of Houston, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2002
- United States v. 22.80 Acres of Land, More or Less, in the County of San Benito, State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. United Technologies Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015
- El Paso Natural Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Gas Company of New Mexico, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.