Legal Opinion · Dissent

Muller v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1980No. 77-204-CRPublished

1DissentShirley S. Abrahamson, J.

I dissent on two grounds: The jury instruction concerning the presumption of intent in this case contravenes sec. 903.08 (3), Rules of Evidence, the state constitution and the federal constitution as interpreted in Sandstrom v. Montana, 442 U.S. 510, 99 S. Ct. 2450 (1979). The trial court erred in failing to give an instruction on manslaughter.

L

The majority appears to concede that that part of the jury instruction which states:

“The law presumes that a reasonable person intends all the natural, probable, and usual consequences of his deliberate acts.”

is substantially similar to the Montana…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Sandstrom v. MontanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. County Court of Ulster Cty. v. AllenSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Lesly Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  4. Nathan Mann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1963
  5. State v. MendozaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API