Legal Opinion
Robert Bosch LLC v. Pylon Manufacturing Corp.
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided July 9, 2009No. Civ. 08-542-SLRPublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SUE L. ROBINSON, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff, Robert Bosch, LLC (“Bosch”), brought suit against defendant, Pylon Manufacturing Corporation (“Pylon”), for patent infringement and false advertising. (D.I. 31 at ¶ 1) The complaint (D.I. 1) was filed on August 25, 2008 and amended (D.I. 31) March 20, 2009. On April 7, 2009, defendant filed this motion, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), to dismiss plaintiffs false advertising claims filed under section 43(a) of the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125(a)(1)(B). (D.I. 35 at 1) The court has jurisdiction…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Christopher v. HarburySupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Dastar Corp. v. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2003
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mike Vaughn Custom Sports, Inc. v. PikuDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- Photographic Illustrators Corp. v. Orgill, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
- 10x Genomics, Inc. v. Celsee, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2019
- Cipla USA, Inc. v. Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2023
- Cipla USA, Inc. v. Ipsen Biopharmaceuticals, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2023
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.