Legal Opinion

Forestkeeper v. Elliott

District Court, E.D. California

Decided September 25, 2014No. 1:13-cv-1721 AWI JLTPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ON PARTIES’ CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND RELATED ORDERS Doc. #’s 18,19, 23 and 24

ANTHONY W. ISHII, Senior District Judge.

This is an action for declaratory and injunctive relief pursuant to the National Environmental Policy Act (“NEPA”) 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321 et seq. At issue is a planned action by defendant Kevin Elliott in his official capacity as Forest Supervisor for the Sequoia National Forest and the United States Forest Service (“Forest Service”) (collectively, (“Defendants”) to implement what the parties refer to as the Ranchería Forest Restoration…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Baltimore Gas & Electric Co. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Center for Biological Diversity v. GouldDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2015
  2. Angga v. Bumble Bee Foods, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2025
  3. Cascade Forest Conservancy v. FrewingDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
  4. Jones v. BecerraDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API