Legal Opinion

Kelly v. Wal Mart Stores, Inc.

District Court, S.D. California

Decided December 4, 2017No. Case No.: 3:16–cv–02000–L–AGSPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hon M. James Lorenz, United States District Judge

Pending before the Court is Defendant Wal Mart Stores, Inc.'s ("Walmart") motion for summary judgment. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1), the Court decides the matter on the papers submitted and without oral argument. For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Walmart's motion.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff Leah Kelly ("Kelly") was an employee at Walmart's store in Santee, California from 2005 until April 2016. Kelly worked as an optician. Since she was thirteen years of age, Kelly has suffered from intractable…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Delbrick Dion Jackson v. Costco Wholesale Corporation, et al.District Court, E.D. California · 2025
  2. Garcia v. Praxair Inc.District Court, E.D. California · 2019
  3. McCaffrey v. Republic Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API