Legal Opinion

Cusimano v. New Orleans Public Service, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 5, 1930No. 30364PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.

This is a suit for damages. The case is thus succinctly stated by the district judge: “In this case it is proved that the plaintiff was a passenger on the defendant’s car; and it is proved that as she was alighting at her destination she fell and received serious injuries. In her petition she charged the defendant with fault and specifies it to be that as she was alighting the car started forward negligently so as to throw her to the ground. . I think the evidence in the case, by prepon deranee, fails to establish this allegation. * * * On the whole, I fin'd it to be a fact that the car did…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hopkins v. New Orleans Railway & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922
  2. Lehman, Stern & Co. v. Morgan's Louisiana & Texas R. & S. S. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1905
  3. Clerc v. Morgan's Louisiana & Texas Railroad & Steamship Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1901
  4. Spurlock v. Shreveport Traction Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1906
  5. Veith v. New Orleans Ry. & Light Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Gross v. Teche Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
  2. Andrepont v. OchsnerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. Meyer v. St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1952
  4. Wallace v. Shreveport Rys. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. Oppenheim v. Toye Bros. Yellow Cab Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1942

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API