Legal Opinion

Texas Department of Human Services v. Hinds

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided October 13, 1993No. 08-92-00314-CVPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARAJAS, Justice.

This is an appeal from a suit brought pursuant to Texas Revised Civil Statutes, Article 6252-16a, more commonly referred to as the Texas “Whistleblower” Act. Trial was by jury. The Texas Department of Human Services of the State of Texas, Appellant, attacks the judgment in favor of Gary Hinds, Appellee, by nine points of error. We reform the judgment of the trial court and affirm the judgment as reformed.

I. SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE

Gary Hinds, Appellee, worked for the Texas Department of Human Services (“TDHS”) for twelve years as an Eligibility Caseworker I at their…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Duhart v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Chastain v. KoonceTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Adams v. Petrade International, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1988
  4. Castaneda v. Texas Department of Agriculture, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1992
  5. Worsham Steel Co. v. Arias, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Texas Department of Human Services v. HindsTexas Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Wichita County, Texas v. HartTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Border Apparel-East, Inc. v. Guadian, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
  4. Border Apparel-East, Inc. v. Guadian, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
  5. Denton v. MorganDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API