Legal Opinion

Holly Investment Co. v. City of Kansas City

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided February 2, 1970No. 25287PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROSS, Judge.

Plaintiff corporation sued defendant city in magistrate court. The petition alleges that defendant forcibly entered upon plaintiff’s property, destroyed a lock, damaged a fence and carelessly and maliciously cut down sixty growing shrubs. Prayer of the petition was for $945.00 actual damages and $1,000.00 punitive damages. Answering, defendant denies generally the allegations of the petition. Affirmatively, defendant alleges that its employees entered the premises to perform a governmental *452function, i. e., to abate a public nuisance arising from an overgrowth of weeds, bushes and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fagan v. Hamilton BankSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Kelm v. HunklerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1892
  3. Pearson v. CarsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1879
  4. Clapper v. BradshawMissouri Court of Appeals · 1912

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Lafayette Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Greater St. Louis v. KoontzMissouri Court of Appeals · 1974
  2. Heinen v. Healthline Management, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1998
  3. State Ex Rel. Blackwell v. ElrodMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Hill, Lehnen & Driskill v. Barter Systems, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. State ex rel. Weisman v. EdwardsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API