Legal Opinion

Henderson v. Banks

Texas Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1888No. 2493PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Galveston. Tried below before the Hon. W. H. Stewart. In this case J. C. Henderson accepted service for himself and his partners, co-defendants; judgment was rendered against J. G. Henderson individally, and against the others as co-partners.

1Opinion of the Court

Acker, Judge.

Appellees, executors of the estate of J. B. Banks, brought this suit to recover several sums of money alleged to have been loaned to, or deposited with, appellants, J. C. Henderson, C. R. Miller and J. B. Henderson, who were partners doing business during the time the several sums of money were received, under the different firm names of J. C. Henderson, Henderson & Miller, and J. 0, Henderson & Bro. Most of the items sued for, amounting to about four thousand three hundred and fifty dollars, were evidenced by due bills, all of which appeared to be barred by limitation, except a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wood v. WheelerTexas Supreme Court · 1851
  2. Tex. & St. L. R. R. Co. v. McCaugheyTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Alexander v. SternTexas Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Sanger Bros. v. Overmier & O'NeilTexas Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Elmendorf v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920
  2. Priddy v. TaborCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916
  3. Ballard v. EllerdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Kohn, Leberman & Co. v. HaasSupreme Court of Alabama · 1891
  5. Milburn v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API