Legal Opinion

Konidaris v. Portnoff Law Associates., Ltd.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 16, 2005PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge SIMPSON.

We are asked to determine the constitutionality of a retroactive amendment to the statute known as the Municipal Claims and Tax Liens Act (Act).1 The retroactive amendment permitted recovery of reasonable attorney collection fees in addition to delinquent property tax. The current issue arises in the context of a suit initiated before enactment of the retroactive amendment. The trial court’s grant of partial summary judgment holding retroactive application of the amendment constitutional is presently before us on appeal by permission.

I. Statutory Background

Before 1996,…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Ieropoli v. AC&S CORP.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  2. Klemow v. Time IncorporatedSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Lewis v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
  4. Minnesota Fire & Casualty Co. v. GreenfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Pentlong Corp. v. GLS Capital, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Konidaris v. Portnoff Law Associates, Ltd.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  2. Harry Miller Corp. v. Mancuso Chemicals LimitedDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Pentlong Corp. v. GLS Capital, Inc.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. PILCHESKY v. DohertyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  5. County Commissioners Ass'n v. DingesCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API