Legal Opinion

People v. Nonella

California Supreme Court

Decided August 17, 1893No. 20959PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco, and from an order denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

Defendant was convicted of the crime of an assault with intent to commit murder, and appealed from the judgment and order denying his motion for a new trial.

The motion for a new trial should have been granted by reason of error committed by the court in admitting improper evidence before the jury. Mrs. Nonella, wife of the defendant, was an eye witness to the affray, and testified in behalf of her husband. Upon cross-examination she was asked the following questions, which were answered in the negative: —

“Didn’t you tell Mrs. Bassi the night of the 22d of February, when no one was present but…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. Lee Ah YuteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. SteevesOregon Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People v. HolmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  3. McLaughlin v. Los Angeles Ry. Corp.California Supreme Court · 1919
  4. Keyes v. Geary St., Park, & Ocean R.R.California Supreme Court · 1907
  5. People v. HovermaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API