Flynn v. Panama Railroad
City of New York Municipal Court
Motion to set aside verdict in an action to recover for personal injuries.
1Opinion of the CourtGenung, J.
The plaintiff, a seaman employed by the defendant, brought this action to recover for personal injuries and expense of maintenance and cure as the result of an accident on March 23, 1921, on one of the defendant’s steamers at Cristobal, Panama. The jury found a verdict for the plaintiff in the full amount claimed, $1,000. The defendant moved to set aside the verdict and to dismiss the complaint on three grounds, that the so-called Jones Act (the Merchant Marine Act of June 5, 1920, chap. 250 [Sec. 33], 41 U. S. Stat. at Large, 1007) is unconstitutional, that the court is without jurisdiction,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Lynott v. . Great Lakes Transit CorporationNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Tammis v. Panama RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Flynn v. Panama RailroadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
3Cited by2 opinions
- Peterson v. Pacific Steamship Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
- Kongs v. Oceanic & Oriental Nav. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1931