Legal Opinion

Tammis v. Panama Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 29, 1922PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kelly, J.:

We have here an action by a mariner, one of the crew of a vessel of the United States engaged in commerce and navigation, to recover damages from the shipowner, his employer, for injuries received in the course of his employment, as he alleges, (1) because of the negligence of the shipowner, (2) because of the unseaworthiness of the vessel.

Every species of tort, however occurring, and whether on board a vessel or not, if upon the high seas or navigable waters, is of admiralty cognizance (Atlantic Transport Co. v. Imbrovek, 234 U. S. 52, 60), and article 3, section 2, subdivision 1,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  2. Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  4. Chelentis v. Luckenbach Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  5. Robb v. ConnollySupreme Court of the United States · 1884

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Patrone v. M. P. Howlett, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1924
  2. Clark v. Montezuma Transportation Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926
  3. Elliott v. SteinfeldtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  4. Beer v. Clyde S. S. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1923
  5. Petterson v. Standard Oil Co. of New JerseyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1924

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API