Legal Opinion

DESILETS GRANITE COMPANY v. Stone Equalizer Corp.

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 3, 1975No. 31-74PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaley, J.

A commercial buyer’s attempted revocation of its acceptance of a stone-splitting machine purchased from a seller is at issue in this appeal. After trial, the Washington County (Superior) Court determined that plaintiff Desilets Granite Company had justifiably revoked acceptance of the purchased product under 9A V.S.A. § 2 — 608. As a consequence, plaintiff was allowed to recover, pursuant to 9A V.S.A. § 2 — 711, the amount of the purchase price already paid to defendant Stone Equalizer Corporation, plus escrow monies representing the unpaid balance of the purchase price.

According to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re J. M.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1973

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. City Nat. Bank of Charleston v. WellsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Matter of Barney Schogel, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1981
  3. Wilk Paving, Inc. v. Southworth-Milton, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1994
  4. Aubrey's R. v. Center, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
  5. Solar Kinetics Corp. v. Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1980

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API