Legal Opinion

Jacobs v. Florida Bar

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided April 10, 1995No. 93-2933PublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KRAVTTCH, Circuit Judge:

This appeal arises out of Appellants’ First and Fourteenth Amendment challenge to certain rules promulgated by the Florida Bar governing attorney advertising. Appellants appeal from the district court’s order granting Appellees’1 motion for summary judgment. The issues we address today are narrow: whether Appellants have standing to challenge the rules, and if so, who bears the burden of proving the constitutionality of the rules? We also must determine whether summary judgment was proper on a vagueness challenge to one of the rules. We hold that Appellants have…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Whitmore Ex Rel. Simmons v. ArkansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. FW/PBS, Inc. v. City of DallasSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. GeorgiaCarry.Org, Inc. v. The State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Craig Pittman v. J. Anthony McLainCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2001
  3. United States v. FrandsenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2000
  4. Vuagniaux v. Department of Professional RegulationIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Jacobs v. the Florida BarCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API