Legal Opinion

R.G. Egan Equipment, Inc. v. Polymag Tek, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 2002PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Thomas A. Standee, J.

The plaintiffs, R.G. Egan Equipment, Inc., Polymag Equipment, Ltd., doing business as Polymag & Co., and Ronald G. Egan (collectively referred to as plaintiffs and/or Egan), submit a motion in limine seeking a ruling before trial admitting two letters dated June 7, 1994 and June 22, 1994 from Eileen Donadío to attorney Robert Bird into evidence at trial for the truth of the matters contained therein and as evidence of the declarant’s state of mind, and a ruling permitting attorney Bird’s testimony about same.

The defendants, Polymag Tek, Inc., Frank…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. W.W.W. Associates, Inc. v. GiancontieriNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Spectrum Systems International v. Chemical BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Phillips v. Joseph Kantor & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Tekni-Plex, Inc. v. Meyner & LandisNew York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. R/S Associates v. New York Job Development AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 2002

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Goodrich v. GoodrichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  2. Goodrich v. GoodrichSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  3. In Re: Queen's University at KingstonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
  4. In Re: Queen's University at KingstonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API