Legal Opinion

State v. Hudson

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 4, 1972No. 52556PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The trial court sustained defense counsel’s motion to quash a Bill oí Information on the ground that further prosecution was prescribed. The State appeals.

The defendant is charged with simple burglary, La.R.S. 14:62, a non-capital burglary. In such cases, La.C.Cr.P. Art. 578 (2) provides that, unless the time limitation is interrupted or suspended, no trial shall be commenced "after two years from the date of institution of the prosecution.”

The State relies upon the provision of La.C.Cr.P. Art. 579 that:

"The period of limitation established by Article 578 shall be interrupted if: "k ‡
“(2) The…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. BensonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. RomeSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
  2. State v. HartonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  3. State v. EbeyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API