Legal Opinion

Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided October 27, 1986No. 16-86CPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MARGOLIS, Judge.

Plaintiff Reichhold Chemicals, Inc. [Reichhold] seeks compensation for damage to chemicals shipped by railroad car from Seattle, Washington to Fairbanks, Alaska on the Alaska Railroad, a common carrier owned and operated by the United States. Reichhold originally filed this action in the United States District Court for the District of Alaska as a tort claim for negligence against the government. The case was transferred to the Claims Court because, although framed in negligence, the claim arose from a promise by the government contained in the bill of lading, a…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. Georgia-Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  2. Emeco Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1973
  3. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  4. Leigh Ellis & Co. v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  5. United States v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Stone Forest Industries, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  2. Pasternack v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987
  3. Schumacher v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API