Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Coleman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 31, 1977No. 76-127PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Romiti

The plaintiff, after the entry of a final judgment for the defendant on the merits, appeals from the earlier entry of an order, pursuant to a section 72 motion (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1975, ch. 110, par. 72), vacating a default judgment entered against the defendant. We find we have no jurisdiction and dismiss.

On January 30, 1975, a default judgment for $1500 was entered in favor of the plaintiff against the defendant, who at that time was acting pro se. On July 16, 1975, the defendant, who had now obtained an attorney, moved pursuant to section 72 of the Civil Practice Act, to have the judgment…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Country Mut. Ins. Co. v. Nat. Bank of DecaturAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969
  2. Goldstick v. SaporitoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1974
  3. Trisko v. Vignola Furniture Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  4. Burkitt v. DowneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1968
  5. Diner's Club, Inc. v. GronwaldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1976

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Sabath v. MansfieldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1978
  2. Fair Automotive Repair, Inc. v. Car-X Service System, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1984
  3. City of Highwood v. ObenbergerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  4. Nenadic v. Grant HospitalAppellate Court of Illinois · 1979
  5. Baird & Warner, Inc. v. Gary-Wheaton BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1984

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API